[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] crashkernel allocation failure #2
- To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:26:11 +0100
- Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:24:11 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
- Thread-index: Ace3Vk4tjKkGYiNJEdys9QAX8io7RQ==
- Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [patch] crashkernel allocation failure #2
On 22/6/07 10:46, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A side effect of the second change is that you can specify just
> "crashkernel=64m" and have it moved to the right place just above the
> xen heap automagically.
Does this really work in practice (i.e., is the crashkernel relocatable)?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel