[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] bitops on irq_cpustat_t->__softirq_pending
On 31 Mar 2006, at 13:03, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Makes sense. In fact I would say any array with NR_CPUS elements should probably be in a per-cpu data area to avoid "__cacheline_aligned" padding.However, we don't have a standard infrastructure for that in Xen right now, and that means that IA64's hardirq.h, part of the weird suck-in-headers-from-Linux thing, is radically different from x86 (and thus PPC). And *that* means it's quite difficult to make any changes to hardirq.h without fear of breaking the IA64 build.
I'm going to pull in percpu support after 3.0.2. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our