[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] APIC handling on x86-64
On 17 Mar 2006, at 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
As we had a report of a problem booting Xen on an IBM x460, dying on the BUG_ON() in init_apic_ldr() in xen/include/asm-x86/mach-summit/mach_apic.h, I started comparing 32- and 64-bit APIC handling. Quickly I found that the same case is handled gracefully in 64-bits, by just tying any extra CPUs to the highest bit. (I suppose, will try to verify this with the originator, that the same machine also doesn't boot with native 32-bit Linux, as the exact sameissue should exist there).While doing the same generally shouldn't be a problem, I wonder why this hasn't been discovered so far and how manyelse differences there exist.
Differences between i386 and x86/64 native Linux APIC handling? A fair few, although mostly it's because crufty old code has been removed from x86/64. I guess there are occasions where Andi Kleen has improved correctness at the same time as cleaning up. :-)
This is the first time that the strategy of taking latest i386 APIC code has let us down I think.
I guess we just patch it in Xen with a comment explaining the extra diff vs native i386 Linux version of the same file.
-- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our