[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs delivery.

To: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:27:27 -0600
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:28:37 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Tristan Gingold wrote:

On ia64, PIC is part of the processor and is already fully-virtualized.
We are considering to switch to event channel.

What do you mean by "already fully virtualized" -- you mean before Xen,this was already part of the architecture? Could you elaborate on that?


--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs delivery.
  - From: Tristan Gingold

References:
- [Xen-devel] IRQs delivery.
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs delivery.
  - From: Hollis Blanchard
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs delivery.
  - From: Tristan Gingold

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [XenPPC] Re: IRQs delivery.
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs delivery.
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs delivery.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread