Hi Matt, On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:20:21AM -0500, Matt Ayres wrote: > Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > > >You need to apply this on top of the other domUloader patches. > >Let me know if this addresses your problem. > > On a side note, WILL domUloader ever be integrated into Xen? Don't know. I definitely would like to see it integrated. I haven't been able to follow the list too well the last weeks, so I'm not aware of the latest discussion status on this. > I much > prefer it over pygrub as it will read from a filesystem (vs partitions) > and relies on the host FS support (so JFS/XFS are no problem). It should not come as a surprise that I like it as well :-) > I know there were some complaints to the implementation, I'm aware of two complaints (1) security concerns (you _mount_ the FS in dom0) (2) the use of kpartx from multipath-tools which seems to be missing from some ancient distros Anything else you are aware of? (1) is a feature and it's the reason why we probably will have pygrub coexist with domUloader :-( (2) we could help, by using fdisk -l and losetup rather than kpartx if the latter is missing; though fdisk -l would limit the supported partition tables to DOS ones. > but is work > being done to make sure that domUloader does not die as a project? Well, domUloader is shipped and used by Novell. I guess I should set up a project page somewhere in case we can't get it included in Xen. Regards, -- Kurt Garloff, Head Architect Linux, Novell Inc.
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel