[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] compatibility

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:24:20 +0100
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:24:49 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

It had been my understanding that the intention after the 3.0.0 release was to 
maintain binary compatibility so that
older kernels would always be able to run on newer hypervisors. There now again 
(there was at least one other case) was
a checkin that broke this (c/s 9120), and I wonder whether I am mistaken with 
the above assumption.

Thanks, Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] compatibility
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Xen Guest Kexec
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] compatibility
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] VMX status report changset 9137:64f11b0e2e7d
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] compatibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread